In re Lajoy

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Lajoy

293 A.D.2d 866, 740 N.Y.S.2d 247, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3842

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 16, 2002·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

By decision dated January 4, 2001, respondent was suspended by this Court for a period of one year (Matter of Lajoy, 279 AD2d 695).

Our examination of the papers submitted on this application indicates that respondent has complied with the provisions of the order of suspension and with this Court’s rules regarding the conduct of suspended attorneys (see, 22 NYCRR 806.9). He has also complied with the requirements of this Court’s rule regarding reinstatement (see, 22 NYCRR 806.12). Petitioner has advised that it does not oppose the application. The application is granted and respondent is reinstated to the practice of law, effective immediately.

Spain, J.P., Mugglin, Rose and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Ordered that respondent’s application is granted and he is reinstated to practice as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective immediately.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

By decision dated January 4, 2001, respondent was suspended by this Court for a period of one year (Matter of Lajoy, 279 AD2d 695).

Our examination of the papers submitted on this application indicates that respondent has complied with the provisions of the order of suspension and with this Court’s rules regarding the conduct of suspended attorneys (see, 22 NYCRR 806.9). He has also complied with the requirements of this Court’s rule regarding reinstatement (see, 22 NYCRR 806.12). Petitioner has advised that it does not oppose the application. The application is granted and respondent is reinstated to the practice of law, effective immediately.

Spain, J.P., Mugglin, Rose and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Ordered that respondent’s application is granted and he is reinstated to practice as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective immediately.

In re Lajoy, 293 A.D.2d 866, 740 N.Y.S.2d 247, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3842 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

293 A.D.2d 866 (In re Lajoy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related