In re Lain
This text of 860 So. 2d 531 (In re Lain) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
Treating respondent’s September 22, 2003 correspondence as a motion by respondent seeking to practice law during the pendency of her reinstatement proceeding,
IT IS ORDERED that the motion be and hereby is denied. There is no procedure in Supreme Court Rule XIX permitting a suspended attorney to practice law prior to a determination that the criteria for reinstatement set forth in Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 24 have been satisfied,
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
860 So. 2d 531, 2003 La. LEXIS 3238, 2003 WL 22682722, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-lain-la-2003.