In re Lain

Supreme Court of Louisiana

In re Lain

860 So. 2d 531, 2003 La. LEXIS 3238, 2003 WL 22682722

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided November 12, 2003·No. No. 2003-OB-2792·Published

Opinion

ORDER

Treating respondent’s September 22, 2003 correspondence as a motion by respondent seeking to practice law during the pendency of her reinstatement proceeding,

IT IS ORDERED that the motion be and hereby is denied. There is no procedure in Supreme Court Rule XIX permitting a suspended attorney to practice law prior to a determination that the criteria for reinstatement set forth in Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 24 have been satisfied,

/s/ Jeffrey P. Victory Justice, Supreme Court of Louisiana

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Treating respondent’s September 22, 2003 correspondence as a motion by respondent seeking to practice law during the pendency of her reinstatement proceeding,

IT IS ORDERED that the motion be and hereby is denied. There is no procedure in Supreme Court Rule XIX permitting a suspended attorney to practice law prior to a determination that the criteria for reinstatement set forth in Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 24 have been satisfied,

/s/ Jeffrey P. Victory Justice, Supreme Court of Louisiana

In re Lain, 860 So. 2d 531, 2003 La. LEXIS 3238, 2003 WL 22682722 (La. 2003).

Pincite

860 So. 2d 531 (In re Lain) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.