In re Laimbeer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Laimbeer

251 A.D. 894, 298 N.Y.S. 638, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8191

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 2, 1937

StatusPublished

This text of 251 A.D. 894 (In re Laimbeer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Laimbeer, 251 A.D. 894, 298 N.Y.S. 638, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8191 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).

Pincite

Opinion

Order of the Surrogate’s Court of Kings county denying, in an accounting proceeding, appellants’ motion to compel respondents, Samuel Marcus and Isidor Wels, who are not parties to the accounting proceeding, to deposit with the clerk of the Surrogate’s Court all books and records in their possession pertaining to the administration of the estate of Henry Grube, deceased, and to permit appellants to make a discovery and inspection thereof, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Davis, Johnston and Close, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order of the Surrogate’s Court of Kings county denying, in an accounting proceeding, appellants’ motion to compel respondents, Samuel Marcus and Isidor Wels, who are not parties to the accounting proceeding, to deposit with the clerk of the Surrogate’s Court all books and records in their possession pertaining to the administration of the estate of Henry Grube, deceased, and to permit appellants to make a discovery and inspection thereof, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Davis, Johnston and Close, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

251 A.D. 894, 298 N.Y.S. 638, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8191, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-laimbeer-nyappdiv-1937.