In re Lago

38 F.2d 887, 1929 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1815
District Court, S.D. New York·Decided November 11, 1929·No. No. 45146·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

BONDY, District Judge.

After carefully considering the unmistakable terms of section 93, subd. (n) title 11, of U. S. Code (11 USCA § 93 (n), and all the authorities to which I have been referred, I am of the opinion that I have not the power to order the filing of the claim in question. Were the granting of the petition a matter of discretion, I should have exercised it in favor of the petitioner. The order therefore must be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Lago, 38 F.2d 887, 1929 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1815 (S.D.N.Y. 1929).

38 F.2d 887 (In re Lago) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related