In re Ladas

280 A.D.2d 202, 720 N.Y.S.2d 883, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1110
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 7, 2001
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 280 A.D.2d 202 (In re Ladas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Ladas, 280 A.D.2d 202, 720 N.Y.S.2d 883, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1110 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

Respondent was admitted to the practice of law by this Court on January 10, 1991, and maintained an office for the practice of law in West Seneca. The Grievance Committee filed a peti[203]*203tion charging respondent with acts of professional misconduct, including converting estate funds. Respondent filed an answer admitting the material allegations of the petition, and appeared before this Court to submit matters in mitigation.

We conclude that respondent violated the following Disciplinary Rules of the Code of Professional Responsibility:

DR 1-102 (a) (4) (22 NYCRR 1200.3 [a] [4]) — engaging in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation;

DR 1-102 (a) (7) (22 NYCRR 1200.3 [a] [7]) — engaging in conduct that adversely reflects on his fitness as a lawyer;

DR 9-102 (a) (22 NYCRR 1200.46 [a]) — misappropriating client funds; and

DR 9-102 (b) (1) (22 NYCRR 1200.46 [b] [1]) — failing to maintain funds of a client in a special account separate from his business or personal accounts.

We have considered the matters in mitigation submitted by respondent, including the fact that respondent has made restitution. Accordingly, we conclude that respondent should be suspended for two years and until further order of the Court.

Pine, J. P., Wisner, Hurlbutt, Scudder and Kehoe, JJ., concur.

Order of suspension entered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Ladas
9 A.D.3d 234 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
280 A.D.2d 202, 720 N.Y.S.2d 883, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1110, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-ladas-nyappdiv-2001.