In Re Labbruzzo

Court of Appeals of Texas

In Re Labbruzzo

225 S.W.3d 634, 2006 Tex. App. LEXIS 7090, 2006 WL 2328558

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided August 10, 2006·No. 08-06-00210-CV·Published

Opinion

*635 OPINION ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS

DAVID WELLINGTON CHEW, Justice.

Relators, Donald V. Labbruzzo, Carlos Camarillo, and Plásticos Promex U.S.A., Inc., seek a writ of mandamus against the Honorable Luis Aguilar, Judge of the 120th District Court of El Paso County. Mandamus will lie only to correct a clear abuse of discretion. Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 883, 840 (Tex.1992)(orig. proceeding). Moreover, there must be no other adequate remedy at law. Id. Based on the petition and record before us, we are unable to conclude that Relators are entitled to the relief requested. Accordingly, we deny mandamus relief. See Tex.R.App.P. 52.8(a). Further, we deny Relators motion for emergency relief. See Tex.R.App.P. 52.10.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*635 OPINION ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS

DAVID WELLINGTON CHEW, Justice.

Relators, Donald V. Labbruzzo, Carlos Camarillo, and Plásticos Promex U.S.A., Inc., seek a writ of mandamus against the Honorable Luis Aguilar, Judge of the 120th District Court of El Paso County. Mandamus will lie only to correct a clear abuse of discretion. Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 883, 840 (Tex.1992)(orig. proceeding). Moreover, there must be no other adequate remedy at law. Id. Based on the petition and record before us, we are unable to conclude that Relators are entitled to the relief requested. Accordingly, we deny mandamus relief. See Tex.R.App.P. 52.8(a). Further, we deny Relators motion for emergency relief. See Tex.R.App.P. 52.10.

In Re Labbruzzo, 225 S.W.3d 634, 2006 Tex. App. LEXIS 7090, 2006 WL 2328558 (Tex. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

225 S.W.3d 634 (In Re Labbruzzo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related