In re La Russo

51 A.3d 116, 212 N.J. 108, 2012 WL 4346706, 2012 N.J. LEXIS 954
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedSeptember 20, 2012
StatusPublished

This text of 51 A.3d 116 (In re La Russo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re La Russo, 51 A.3d 116, 212 N.J. 108, 2012 WL 4346706, 2012 N.J. LEXIS 954 (N.J. 2012).

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 12-062, concluding that ANTHONY J. LA RUSSO of CALDWELL, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1969, should be suspended from the practice of law for a period of three months for violating RPC 1.1(a) (gross neglect), RPC 1.1(b) (pattern of neglect), RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence), and RPC 1.7(a)(2) (conflict of interest);

And the Court having determined from its review of the matter that a censure is the appropriate quantum of discipline for respondent’s unethical conduct;

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that ANTHONY J. LA RUSSO is hereby censured; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

[109]*109ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
51 A.3d 116, 212 N.J. 108, 2012 WL 4346706, 2012 N.J. LEXIS 954, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-la-russo-nj-2012.