In re La Bue

98 A.D.2d 84, 469 N.Y.S.2d 498, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 20851
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 16, 1983
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 98 A.D.2d 84 (In re La Bue) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re La Bue, 98 A.D.2d 84, 469 N.Y.S.2d 498, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 20851 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

Respondent was admitted to practice by this court in 1957 and maintains an office for the practice of law in Rochester, New York. The uncontroverted allegations of the petition show that respondent was retained as attorney for an estate and in July, 1981 deposited $13,506.14 of estate moneys in an account entitled “A. James LaBue, Attorney’s Account”. Respondent failed to identify and preserve $12,901.14 of those funds (he disbursed the remaining $605 for estate expenses); the bank’s ledger statements pertaining to the account reflect monthly balances well below the sum of $12,901.14. Respondent has since reimbursed the estate with interest. His assertion that he always intended to repay the estate and was able to do so, if established, would be no defense to the charge that he violated 22 NYCRR 1022.5 (a) and (b) (commingling and converting a client’s funds and withdrawing moneys for his [85]*85own use) (see Matter of LaCava, 53 AD2d 204; Matter of Iversen, 51 AD2d 422).

Respondent is guilty of violating DR 9-102 (A) and (B) of the Code of Professional Responsibility and this department’s rules relating to attorneys (22 NYCRR 1022.5 [a], [b]).

After considering the mitigating circumstances including his payment in full of the moneys with interest and his otherwise clear record, we conclude that he should be suspended from the practice of law for one year and until the further order of this court.

Dillon, P. J., Hancock, Jr., Callahan, Doerr and Denman, JJ., concur.

Order of suspension entered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Getman
147 A.D.2d 163 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
In re Blaney
113 A.D.2d 72 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)
In re Richards
106 A.D.2d 156 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
98 A.D.2d 84, 469 N.Y.S.2d 498, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 20851, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-la-bue-nyappdiv-1983.