In re Kyra C.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Kyra C.

275 A.D.2d 678, 713 N.Y.S.2d 688, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9937

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 28, 2000

StatusPublished

This text of 275 A.D.2d 678 (In re Kyra C.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Kyra C., 275 A.D.2d 678, 713 N.Y.S.2d 688, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9937 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

—Order of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Sheldon Rand, J.), entered on or about February 19, 1999, which adjudicated ap[679]*679pellant a juvenile delinquent, upon a fact-finding determination that she committed an act which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crime of attempted assault in the second degree, and placed her on probation for two years, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court’s finding was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. There is no basis upon which to disturb the court’s determinations concerning credibility. The credible evidence supported a reasonable inference that, when appellant struck the complainant repeatedly with a chair leg, she intended to cause physical injury. Concur — Nardelli, J. P., Mazzarelli, Lerner, Andrias and Buckley, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Sheldon Rand, J.), entered on or about February 19, 1999, which adjudicated ap[679]*679pellant a juvenile delinquent, upon a fact-finding determination that she committed an act which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crime of attempted assault in the second degree, and placed her on probation for two years, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court’s finding was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. There is no basis upon which to disturb the court’s determinations concerning credibility. The credible evidence supported a reasonable inference that, when appellant struck the complainant repeatedly with a chair leg, she intended to cause physical injury. Concur — Nardelli, J. P., Mazzarelli, Lerner, Andrias and Buckley, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

275 A.D.2d 678, 713 N.Y.S.2d 688, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9937, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-kyra-c-nyappdiv-2000.