In re Kyle Michael M.
This text of 281 A.D.2d 954 (In re Kyle Michael M.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs and matter remitted to Supreme Court for further proceedings in accordance with the following Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in denying the petition of the biological mother and granting the cross petition of the biological father, each seeking to change the name of the parties’ infant son, without conducting a hearing to determine whether “the interests of the infant will be substantially promoted by the change” (Civil Rights Law § 63). The record is insufficient to establish whether either name change requested would substantially promote the [955]*955interests of the infant, and thus we reverse the order and remit the matter to Supreme Court for a hearing on the petition and cross petition. (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Niagara County, Koshian, J. — Name Change.) Present — Pigott, Jr., P. J., Green, Wisner, Kehoe and Burns, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
281 A.D.2d 954, 722 N.Y.S.2d 661, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2672, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-kyle-michael-m-nyappdiv-2001.