In re Kwaczala
This text of 11 F. App'x 131 (In re Kwaczala) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Roy Kwaczala filed a petition for a writ of mandamus seeking to have this court issue an order directing the district court to act on his petition for writ of error coram nobis. He requested leave to proceed in forma pauperis with regard to his mandamus petition. A review of the district court docket reveals that the district court recently denied Kwaczala’s petition for writ of error coram nobis. See Kwac[132]*132zala v. United States, No. CR-93-142 (W.D.N.C. Mar. 6, 2001). Accordingly, although. we grant Kwaczala’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we dismiss the mandamus petition as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
11 F. App'x 131, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-kwaczala-ca4-2001.