In re Kurzeja

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Kurzeja

754 A.2d 525, 164 N.J. 563, 2000 N.J. LEXIS 1002

DecidedJuly 17, 2000

StatusPublished

This text of 754 A.2d 525 (In re Kurzeja) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Kurzeja, 754 A.2d 525, 164 N.J. 563, 2000 N.J. LEXIS 1002 (N.J. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision concluding that RONALD KURZEJA of SHREWS-[564]*564BURY, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1986, should be disciplined for violating RPC 1.1(a) (gross neglect), RPC 1.1(b) (pattern of neglect), RPC 1.4(b) (failure to explain matter to the extent necessary for client to make informed decision regarding representation), and RPC 8.4(c) (dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that RONALD KURZEJA is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision concluding that RONALD KURZEJA of SHREWS-[564]*564BURY, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1986, should be disciplined for violating RPC 1.1(a) (gross neglect), RPC 1.1(b) (pattern of neglect), RPC 1.4(b) (failure to explain matter to the extent necessary for client to make informed decision regarding representation), and RPC 8.4(c) (dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that RONALD KURZEJA is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

754 A.2d 525, 164 N.J. 563, 2000 N.J. LEXIS 1002, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-kurzeja-nj-2000.