In re Kursheedt Manuf'g Co.

49 F. 633, 1892 U.S. App. LEXIS 1644

This text of 49 F. 633 (In re Kursheedt Manuf'g Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Kursheedt Manuf'g Co., 49 F. 633, 1892 U.S. App. LEXIS 1644 (circtsdny 1892).

Opinion

Lacombe, Circuit Judge.

I do not think that I should interfere with the finding of the board of general appraisers. This is a case where, un[635]*635der the old practice, I should send it to the jury to determine whether, by the ordinary processes of manufacture, the article had been advanced, in the meaning as understood in trade and commerce, outside of and ’beyond the group of articles included in paragraph 850; and their verdict, on such-evidence as there is here, I should not disturb, whatever it might be. Under these circumstances, I shall not disturb the finding of the board of general appraisers. Decision affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
49 F. 633, 1892 U.S. App. LEXIS 1644, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-kursheedt-manufg-co-circtsdny-1892.