In re Kursheedt Manuf'g Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

In re Kursheedt Manuf'g Co.

49 F. 633, 1892 U.S. App. LEXIS 1644

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York·Decided March 9, 1892·Published

Opinion

Lacombe, Circuit Judge.

I do not think that I should interfere with the finding of the board of general appraisers. This is a case where, un[635] der the old practice, I should send it to the jury to determine whether, by the ordinary processes of manufacture, the article had been advanced, in the meaning as understood in trade and commerce, outside of and ’beyond the group of articles included in paragraph 850; and their verdict, on such-evidence as there is here, I should not disturb, whatever it might be. Under these circumstances, I shall not disturb the finding of the board of general appraisers. Decision affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lacombe, Circuit Judge.

I do not think that I should interfere with the finding of the board of general appraisers. This is a case where, un[635] der the old practice, I should send it to the jury to determine whether, by the ordinary processes of manufacture, the article had been advanced, in the meaning as understood in trade and commerce, outside of and ’beyond the group of articles included in paragraph 850; and their verdict, on such-evidence as there is here, I should not disturb, whatever it might be. Under these circumstances, I shall not disturb the finding of the board of general appraisers. Decision affirmed.

In re Kursheedt Manuf'g Co., 49 F. 633, 1892 U.S. App. LEXIS 1644 (circtsdny 1892).

Pincite

49 F. 633 (In re Kursheedt Manuf'g Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.