in Re Kuraray America, Inc.
This text of in Re Kuraray America, Inc. (in Re Kuraray America, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed July 12, 2022.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
NO. 14-21-00503-CV
IN RE KURARAY AMERICA, INC., Relator
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 234th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2018-62973
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Relator Kuraray America, Inc. filed a petition for writ of mandamus and emergency motion for temporary relief in this Court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator asks this Court to compel the Honorable Lauren Reeder, presiding judge of the 234th District Court of Harris County, to “vacate its June 25 and August 19, 2021 orders, deny Plaintiffs’ and Providers’ Motions to Quash Production, and grant Kuraray America’s Motion to Reconsider Production of Medical Reimbursement Discovery and to Compel.”
Relator has not established that it is entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus. Additionally, our October 14, 2021 stay is lifted.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Jewell, Bourliot, and Zimmerer.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Kuraray America, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-kuraray-america-inc-texapp-2022.