In re Kunkle

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

In re Kunkle

779 A.2d 1141

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedJuly 23, 2001

DocketNo. 681 Disciplinary Docket No. 3

StatusPublished

This text of 779 A.2d 1141 (In re Kunkle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Kunkle, 779 A.2d 1141 (Pa. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 23rd day of July, 2001, a Rule having been entered by this Court on May 31, 2001, pursuant to Rule 214(d)(1), Pa.R.D.E., directing Douglas Gerald Kunkle to show cause why he should not be placed on temporary suspension and upon consideration of the responses filed, it is hereby

ORDERED that the Rule is made absolute; Douglas Gerald Kunkle is placed on temporary suspension and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa. R.D.E.; and the matter is referred to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 214(f)(1), Pa.R.D.E.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 23rd day of July, 2001, a Rule having been entered by this Court on May 31, 2001, pursuant to Rule 214(d)(1), Pa.R.D.E., directing Douglas Gerald Kunkle to show cause why he should not be placed on temporary suspension and upon consideration of the responses filed, it is hereby

ORDERED that the Rule is made absolute; Douglas Gerald Kunkle is placed on temporary suspension and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa. R.D.E.; and the matter is referred to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 214(f)(1), Pa.R.D.E.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

779 A.2d 1141, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-kunkle-pa-2001.