In re Kuhn

D.C. Circuit

In re Kuhn

269 F. 1020, 50 App. D.C. 401, 1921 U.S. App. LEXIS 2380

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedJanuary 3, 1921

DocketNo. 1334

StatusPublished

This text of 269 F. 1020 (In re Kuhn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Kuhn, 269 F. 1020, 50 App. D.C. 401, 1921 U.S. App. LEXIS 2380 (D.C. Cir. 1921).

Pincite

Opinion

ROBB, Associate Justice.

Appeal from a decision of the Commissioner of Patents, refusing six claims for a patent on a machine for mining coal; the ground of the decision being that no patentable advance has been made over the prior art. We have carefully considered the points made in appellant’s brief, as elucidated by his argument at the hearing of the case, and, being convinced that the decision of the Patent Office tribunals was right, we affirm it upon the grounds stated by them. Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ROBB, Associate Justice.

Appeal from a decision of the Commissioner of Patents, refusing six claims for a patent on a machine for mining coal; the ground of the decision being that no patentable advance has been made over the prior art. We have carefully considered the points made in appellant’s brief, as elucidated by his argument at the hearing of the case, and, being convinced that the decision of the Patent Office tribunals was right, we affirm it upon the grounds stated by them. Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

269 F. 1020, 50 App. D.C. 401, 1921 U.S. App. LEXIS 2380, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-kuhn-cadc-1921.