In re Kuhn

D.C. Circuit

In re Kuhn

269 F. 1020, 50 App. D.C. 401, 1921 U.S. App. LEXIS 2380

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided January 3, 1921·No. No. 1334·Published

Opinion

ROBB, Associate Justice.

Appeal from a decision of the Commissioner of Patents, refusing six claims for a patent on a machine for mining coal; the ground of the decision being that no patentable advance has been made over the prior art. We have carefully considered the points made in appellant’s brief, as elucidated by his argument at the hearing of the case, and, being convinced that the decision of the Patent Office tribunals was right, we affirm it upon the grounds stated by them. Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ROBB, Associate Justice.

Appeal from a decision of the Commissioner of Patents, refusing six claims for a patent on a machine for mining coal; the ground of the decision being that no patentable advance has been made over the prior art. We have carefully considered the points made in appellant’s brief, as elucidated by his argument at the hearing of the case, and, being convinced that the decision of the Patent Office tribunals was right, we affirm it upon the grounds stated by them. Affirmed.

In re Kuhn, 269 F. 1020, 50 App. D.C. 401, 1921 U.S. App. LEXIS 2380 (D.C. Cir. 1921).

Pincite

269 F. 1020 (In re Kuhn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.