In re Kuffler

Second Circuit

In re Kuffler

168 F. 1021, 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 4538

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedMarch 16, 1909

DocketNos. 15, 22

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 168 F. 1021 (In re Kuffler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Kuffler, 168 F. 1021, 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 4538 (2d Cir. 1909).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The order of the bankruptcy court (Eastern district of New York) now sought to be reviewed is in the precise form which this court approved upon the former appeal. In re Kuffler, 151 Fed. 12, 80 C. C. A. 508. It is “limited to a stay of any application for a discharge from the debts scheduled in the former proceeding.” Wo see no reason to modify our former decision. The debts due to Hinsdale, Smith & Co. and to Joseph Mayer’s Sons were included in the former schedule, and did not become new and different debts because judgment has been entered upon them in the interim. Boynton v. Ball, 121 U. S. 465, 7 Sup. Ct. 981, 30 L. Ed. 985. The order of the District Court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The order of the bankruptcy court (Eastern district of New York) now sought to be reviewed is in the precise form which this court approved upon the former appeal. In re Kuffler, 151 Fed. 12, 80 C. C. A. 508. It is “limited to a stay of any application for a discharge from the debts scheduled in the former proceeding.” Wo see no reason to modify our former decision. The debts due to Hinsdale, Smith & Co. and to Joseph Mayer’s Sons were included in the former schedule, and did not become new and different debts because judgment has been entered upon them in the interim. Boynton v. Ball, 121 U. S. 465, 7 Sup. Ct. 981, 30 L. Ed. 985. The order of the District Court is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

168 F. 1021, 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 4538, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-kuffler-ca2-1909.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack