In re Krywalski

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Krywalski

26 A.D.2d 894, 274 N.Y.S.2d 670, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3372

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 20, 1966

StatusPublished

This text of 26 A.D.2d 894 (In re Krywalski) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Krywalski, 26 A.D.2d 894, 274 N.Y.S.2d 670, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3372 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

Order insofar as appealed from unanimously modified in accordance with the Memorandum and as modified affirmed. Memorandum: Upon the adjudication of juvenile delinquency the Family Court entered an order of disposition placing the juvenile on probation on certain terms including a direction “ to make restitution of $50 to the owner of the car at the rate of $3 weekly. Industry suspended.” Section 753 of the Family Court Act provides that an order of disposition may provide for putting a respondent on probation in accordance with section 757 of the Family Court Act. Section 757 provides the rules of court shall define permissible terms and conditions of probation. Rule 7.6 of the Rules of the Family Court of the State of New York sets forth the terms and conditions of probation which may be imposed. No provision is made in the statute or rules for restitution as one of the permissible terms and conditions of probation or suspension of judgment. The order of disposition should be modified by eliminating that part of it that requires the respondent to make restitution. (Appeal from that part of an order of Erie Family Court which ordered restitution and suspended sentence.) Present—Bastow, J. P., Henry, Del Vecchio and Marsh, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order insofar as appealed from unanimously modified in accordance with the Memorandum and as modified affirmed. Memorandum: Upon the adjudication of juvenile delinquency the Family Court entered an order of disposition placing the juvenile on probation on certain terms including a direction “ to make restitution of $50 to the owner of the car at the rate of $3 weekly. Industry suspended.” Section 753 of the Family Court Act provides that an order of disposition may provide for putting a respondent on probation in accordance with section 757 of the Family Court Act. Section 757 provides the rules of court shall define permissible terms and conditions of probation. Rule 7.6 of the Rules of the Family Court of the State of New York sets forth the terms and conditions of probation which may be imposed. No provision is made in the statute or rules for restitution as one of the permissible terms and conditions of probation or suspension of judgment. The order of disposition should be modified by eliminating that part of it that requires the respondent to make restitution. (Appeal from that part of an order of Erie Family Court which ordered restitution and suspended sentence.) Present—Bastow, J. P., Henry, Del Vecchio and Marsh, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

26 A.D.2d 894, 274 N.Y.S.2d 670, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3372, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-krywalski-nyappdiv-1966.