In re Krouner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Krouner

84 A.D.3d 1585, 922 N.Y.S.2d 816

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 12, 2011

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 84 A.D.3d 1585 (In re Krouner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Krouner, 84 A.D.3d 1585, 922 N.Y.S.2d 816 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Respondent was admitted to practice by this Court in 1973. He maintained an office for the practice of law in the City of Albany. He presently resides in San Diego, California.

On February 20, 2003, respondent pleaded guilty to three felonies in Supreme Court in Albany County and, accordingly, this Court entered an order of disbarment on May 23, 2003 (Matter of Krouner, 305 AD2d 932 [2003]). Respondent now applies for reinstatement. Petitioner advises that it does not oppose the application.

Because we conclude that respondent has not shown by clear and convincing evidence that he possesses the character and general fitness to resume the practice of law, we deny his application for reinstatement.

Mercure, J.E, Spain, Rose, Malone Jr. and Garry, JJ., concur. Ordered that respondent’s application for reinstatement is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI