In re Krojanker
This text of 44 F. 482 (In re Krojanker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The objections to the form of certificate seem to be sufficiently answered in the opinion of this court in Re Behrendt, 23 Blatchf. 40, 22 Fed. Rep. 699. The case against Simon seems reasonably clear. As against Julius, it is very weak, and it may be doubtful whether the evidence submitted fairly warrants the conclusion arrived at by tlie commissioner. The question, however, is one not as to the competency of the evidence, but as to its weight, and his decision thereon is not reviewable. In re Oteiza y Cortes, 136 U. S. 330, 10 Sup. Ct. Rep. 1031. Let the writs be discharged..
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
44 F. 482, 1890 U.S. App. LEXIS 1890, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-krojanker-circtsdny-1890.