In re Krojanker

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

In re Krojanker

44 F. 482, 1890 U.S. App. LEXIS 1890

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York·Decided November 11, 1890·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Lacombb, Circuit Judge.

The objections to the form of certificate seem to be sufficiently answered in the opinion of this court in Re Behrendt, 23 Blatchf. 40, 22 Fed. Rep. 699. The case against Simon seems reasonably clear. As against Julius, it is very weak, and it may be doubtful whether the evidence submitted fairly warrants the conclusion arrived at by tlie commissioner. The question, however, is one not as to the competency of the evidence, but as to its weight, and his decision thereon is not reviewable. In re Oteiza y Cortes, 136 U. S. 330, 10 Sup. Ct. Rep. 1031. Let the writs be discharged..

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lacombb, Circuit Judge.

The objections to the form of certificate seem to be sufficiently answered in the opinion of this court in Re Behrendt, 23 Blatchf. 40, 22 Fed. Rep. 699. The case against Simon seems reasonably clear. As against Julius, it is very weak, and it may be doubtful whether the evidence submitted fairly warrants the conclusion arrived at by tlie commissioner. The question, however, is one not as to the competency of the evidence, but as to its weight, and his decision thereon is not reviewable. In re Oteiza y Cortes, 136 U. S. 330, 10 Sup. Ct. Rep. 1031. Let the writs be discharged..

In re Krojanker, 44 F. 482, 1890 U.S. App. LEXIS 1890 (circtsdny 1890).

Pincite

44 F. 482 (In re Krojanker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related