In Re: Kristopher Gene Guillaume, Alan E. Devoe and Sylvia J. Guillaume v. the State of Texas
This text of In Re: Kristopher Gene Guillaume, Alan E. Devoe and Sylvia J. Guillaume v. the State of Texas (In Re: Kristopher Gene Guillaume, Alan E. Devoe and Sylvia J. Guillaume v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DENIED and Opinion Filed August 19, 2024
S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-24-00902-CV
IN RE KRISTOPHER GENE GUILLAUME, ALAN E. DEVOE, AND SYLVIA J. GUILLAUME, Relators
Original Proceeding from the County Court at Law No. 2 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC-24-00774-B
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Pedersen, III, Smith, and Garcia Opinion by Justice Pedersen, III In their July 31, 2024 petition for writ of mandamus, relators contend the
judgment in the underlying case is void for various reasons.
Upon review, relators’ petition does not meet the requirements of the Texas
Rules of Appellate Procedure for consideration of mandamus relief. See In re
Backusy, No. 05-23-00674-CV, 2023 WL 4540278, at *1 (Tex. App.—Dallas July
14, 2023, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.); see also TEX. R. APP. P. 52.2, 52.3(a),
52.3(d), 52.3(e), 52.3(g), 52.3(h), 52.3(j), 52.3(k)(1)(A), 52.7(a)(1), 52.7(a)(2). For
example, the person filing the petition failed to certify that he or she has reviewed
the petition and concluded that every factual statement in the petition is supported by competent evidence included in the appendix or record, as required by rule
52.3(j). See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.3(j); In re Stewart, No. 05-19-01338-CV, 2020 WL
401764, at *1 (Tex. App.—Dallas Jan. 24, 2020, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.)
(explaining that our precedent requires “exceptionally strict compliance” with rule
52.3(j)). Additionally, the documents included in the appendix and record are not
properly certified or sworn copies. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.3(k)(1)(A), 52.7(a)(1);
In re Leonard, No. 05-23-00546-CV, 2023 WL 3944376, at *1 (Tex. App.—Dallas
June 12, 2023, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.) (explaining how to obtain properly
certified or sworn copies).
Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus.
/Bill Pedersen, III/ BILL PEDERSEN, III 240902F.P05 JUSTICE
–2–
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In Re: Kristopher Gene Guillaume, Alan E. Devoe and Sylvia J. Guillaume v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-kristopher-gene-guillaume-alan-e-devoe-and-sylvia-j-guillaume-v-texapp-2024.