in Re Kristofer Thomas Kastner
Opinion
Opinion issued August 20, 2013
In The
Court of Appeals
For The
First District of Texas
CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. § 11.102(c) (West Supp. 2012) (providing that decision of local administrative judge denying litigant permission to file litigation may be reviewed by petition for writ of mandamus to court of appeals); TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. § 11.103(a) (West Supp. 2012) ( “[A] clerk of a court may not file a litigation, original proceeding, appeal, or other claim presented by a vexatious litigant subject to a prefiling order . . . unless the litigant obtains an order from the local administrative judge under Section 11.102 permitting the filing of the litigation.”); In re Johnson, 390 S.W.3d 584, 585–86 (Tex. App.—Amarillo 2012, orig. proceeding); In re Potts, 357 S.W.3d 766, 768 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2011, orig. proceeding); Brown v. Texas Bd. of Nursing Exam’rs, 194 S.W.3d 721, 722–23 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2006, no pet.).
We deny the petition for writ of mandamus. All pending motions are dismissed as moot.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Higley and Brown.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
in Re Kristofer Thomas Kastner (in Re Kristofer Thomas Kastner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.