In Re Kristina Castillo v. the State of Texas

Opinion

Opinion issued August 19, 2025

In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas

dismiss relator’s petition for writ of mandamus for lack of jurisdiction. See TEX.

GOV’T CODE § 22.221(a), (b), (c)(2); see also In re Montiel, No. 01-23-00893-CV,

2023 WL 8720907, at *1 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] Dec. 19, 2023, orig.

proceeding). Any remaining motions are likewise dismissed as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Rivas-Molloy, Guiney, and Morgan.

Footnotes

1. NO. 01-25-00607-CV ——————————— IN RE KRISTINA CASTILLO, Relator Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus MEMORANDUM OPINION Relator Kristina Castillo seeks mandamus relief from the June 17, 2025 order denying her motion to dismiss. The order was signed by an associate judge.1 Because we have no jurisdiction to issue a writ of mandamus against this associate judge, and relator has not demonstrated any threat to our jurisdiction, we 1 The underlying case is Kristina Castillo v. Comcast Corporation, cause number 25-CCV-076958, pending in the County Court at Law No. 3 of Fort Bend County, Texas, the Honorable Juli A. Mathew presiding, with Associate Judge Lewis M. White.