In Re Kristen Gine' Straker v. the State of Texas
This text of In Re Kristen Gine' Straker v. the State of Texas (In Re Kristen Gine' Straker v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-25-00418-CV
In re Kristen Gine’ Straker
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM BELL COUNTY
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Relator has filed a petition for writ of mandamus complaining of the trial court’s
October 4, 2023 default divorce decree and all orders following it. She seeks “(a) partial
affirmance of the single sentence dissolving the marriage, (b) reversal and remand of every
remaining provision of the decree, and (c) strictly ministerial restitution and turnover relief—
including a directive that the Office of the Attorney General credit or refund all improperly
collected support to Relator.”1 Relator argues the divorce decree and all orders thereafter were
“entered without lawful service, without compliance with the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act,
and without the sworn financial disclosures or best-interest findings required under Texas law.”2
“Mandamus is not an appropriate means of reviewing a final default judgment
rendered while the trial court had jurisdiction to do so.” In re Barber, 982 S.W.2d 364, 368
Relator’s Supplemental Statement Regarding Relator’s Amended Petition for Writ of 1
Mandamus. 2 Relator’s Amended Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (Tex. 1998) (orig. proceeding); see PNS Stores, Inc. v. Rivera, 379 S.W.3d 267, 275 (Tex. 2012)
(discussing difference between void default judgments and voidable default judgments).
“Instead, after the time for regular appeal has run, such a judgment may be attacked only by
restricted appeal or equitable bill of review.” In re Barber, 982 S.W.2d at 368.
Having reviewed the petition, the responses from the real parties in interest, and
the record provided, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).
__________________________________________ Chari L. Kelly, Justice
Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Kelly and Ellis
Filed: July 23, 2025
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In Re Kristen Gine' Straker v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-kristen-gine-straker-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2025.