In re Krishnan

Federal Circuit

In re Krishnan

578 F. App'x 989

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided September 19, 2014·No. No. 2014-1649·Published

Opinion

ORDER

O’MALLEY, Circuit Judge.

The Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“PTO”) moves without opposition to remand this case to the PTO for further proceedings.

The Patent Trial and Appeal Board affirmed the Examiner’s rejection of certain claims, but the PTO concedes that the Board should reconsider its rejection in light of the PTO’s examination policy on “configured to” claim language.

Accordingly,

It Is ORDERED That:

[990] (1) The motion is granted. This case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with this order.

(2) Each side shall bear its own costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

O’MALLEY, Circuit Judge.

The Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“PTO”) moves without opposition to remand this case to the PTO for further proceedings.

The Patent Trial and Appeal Board affirmed the Examiner’s rejection of certain claims, but the PTO concedes that the Board should reconsider its rejection in light of the PTO’s examination policy on “configured to” claim language.

Accordingly,

It Is ORDERED That:

[990] (1) The motion is granted. This case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with this order.

(2) Each side shall bear its own costs.

In re Krishnan, 578 F. App'x 989 (Fed. Cir. 2014).

Pincite

578 F. App'x 989 (In re Krishnan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.