In re Kress

892 A.2d 681, 186 N.J. 159, 2006 N.J. LEXIS 369
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedMarch 15, 2006
StatusPublished

This text of 892 A.2d 681 (In re Kress) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Kress, 892 A.2d 681, 186 N.J. 159, 2006 N.J. LEXIS 369 (N.J. 2006).

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 05-295, 05-296 and 05-297, concluding that RICHARD H. KRESS of MOUNTAINSIDE, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1979, should be suspended from the practice of law for a period of six months for violating RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence), RPC 1.4(a) and (b) (failure to communicate with client), RPC 1.5(b) (failure to put in writing basis or rate of hourly fee), RPC 1.16(a)(2) (failure to terminate representation when the lawyer’s physical or mental condition materially impairs the lawyer’s ability to represent the client) and RPC 8.4(e) (conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that RICHARD H. KRESS is suspended from the practice of law for a period of six months and until the further Order of the Court, effective April 10, 2006; and it is further

ORDERED that RICHARD H. KRESS comply with Rule 1:20-20, dealing with suspended attorneys; and it is further

ORDERED that pursuant to Rule 1:20-20(c), respondent’s failure to comply with the Affidavit of Compliance requirement of [160]*160Rule 1:20-20(b)(15) may (1) preclude the Disciplinary Review Board from considering respondent’s petition for reinstatement for a period of up to six months from the date respondent files proof of compliance; (2) be found to constitute a violation of RPC 8.1(b) and RPC 8.4(c); and (3) provide a basis for an action for contempt pursuant to Rule 1:10-2; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
892 A.2d 681, 186 N.J. 159, 2006 N.J. LEXIS 369, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-kress-nj-2006.