In re Kramer

New York Court of Appeals

In re Kramer

765 N.E.2d 298, 97 N.Y.2d 697, 739 N.Y.S.2d 94, 2002 N.Y. LEXIS 87

DecidedJanuary 15, 2002

StatusPublished

This text of 765 N.E.2d 298 (In re Kramer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Kramer, 765 N.E.2d 298, 97 N.Y.2d 697, 739 N.Y.S.2d 94, 2002 N.Y. LEXIS 87 (N.Y. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the Appellate Division order of disbarment, dismissed as untimely. The prior motion for leave to appeal made to the Appellate Division was untimely (Karger, Powers of the New York Court of Appeals § 73, at 452 [3d ed]); motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the other specified Appellate Division orders, [698]*698dismissed upon the ground that such orders do not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution.

Judge Graffeo taking no part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the Appellate Division order of disbarment, dismissed as untimely. The prior motion for leave to appeal made to the Appellate Division was untimely (Karger, Powers of the New York Court of Appeals § 73, at 452 [3d ed]); motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the other specified Appellate Division orders, [698]*698dismissed upon the ground that such orders do not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution.

Judge Graffeo taking no part.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

765 N.E.2d 298, 97 N.Y.2d 697, 739 N.Y.S.2d 94, 2002 N.Y. LEXIS 87, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-kramer-ny-2002.