In re Kraft

737 A.2d 1136, 162 N.J. 6, 1999 N.J. LEXIS 1194
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedOctober 8, 1999
StatusPublished

This text of 737 A.2d 1136 (In re Kraft) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Kraft, 737 A.2d 1136, 162 N.J. 6, 1999 N.J. LEXIS 1194 (N.J. 1999).

Opinion

ORDER

The Office of Attorney Ethics having filed a petition with the Court pursuant to Rule 1:20 — 3(g) and Rule 1:20-11 seeking the immediate temporary suspension of W. RANDOLPH KRAFT of [7]*7MIDDLETOWN, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1989;

And the Court having ordered respondent to show cause why he should not be temporarily suspended from practice;

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that W. RANDOLPH KRAFT is temporarily suspended from the practice of law pending the conclusion of ethics proceedings against him, effective immediately and until the further Order of this Court; and it is further

ORDERED that W. RANDOLPH KRAFT be restrained and enjoined from practicing law during the period of his suspension; and it is further

ORDERED that W. RANDOLPH KRAFT comply with Rule 1:20-20 dealing with suspended attorneys.

Chief Justice PORITZ, C.J., Justice GARIBALDI, Justice COLEMAN, and Justice VERNIERO join in the Court’s Order. Justice O’HERN, Justice STEIN, and Justice LONG would deny the petition for temporary suspension on the condition that respondent present a plan for hands-on supervision of respondent’s active files together with supervision of respondent’s attorney trust account.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
737 A.2d 1136, 162 N.J. 6, 1999 N.J. LEXIS 1194, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-kraft-nj-1999.