In re Kountz's Trust
96 A. 1097, 251 Pa. 582, 1916 Pa. LEXIS 508
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided January 3, 1916·No. Appeal, No. 151·Published·Cited by 4 cases
Opinion
The correct conclusion of the learned court below was that under Kountz’s Est. (No. 1), 213 Pa. 390, the deed of trust executed by Peninah W. Kountz on January 8, 1898, offended the rule against perpetuities and was therefore void. What was said by Mr. Justice Potter in that case of the will of the testatrix applies with equal force to her said deed.
Appeal dismissed at appellant’s costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Kountz's Trust, 96 A. 1097, 251 Pa. 582, 1916 Pa. LEXIS 508 (Pa. 1916).
96 A. 1097 (In re Kountz's Trust) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Smith v. Commissioner
1 T.C. 963 (U.S. Tax Court, 1943)
Quigley's Estate
198 A. 85 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1938)
Quigley's Estate
28 Pa. D. & C. 56 (Philadelphia County Orphans' Court, 1936)
Ledwith v. Hurst
130 A. 315 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1925)