In re Kornmehl

87 F. 314, 1898 U.S. App. LEXIS 1799
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York
DecidedMay 23, 1898
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 87 F. 314 (In re Kornmehl) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Kornmehl, 87 F. 314, 1898 U.S. App. LEXIS 1799 (circtsdny 1898).

Opinion

LACOMBE, Circuit Judge.

“If any minor alien, suffering with said loathsome disease is accompanied by its parents, oik; parent should be returned with such alien as its natura! guardian or protector.”

This instruction seems to he wholly unwarranted by any provision of the statutes. At least, such examination of them as this court has been able to give fails to disclose any phraseology which can he construed as leaving the exclusion of immigrants to the mere arbitrary discretion of the secretary of the treasury or of the commissioner genera] of immigration. Rules and regulations may be made to carry out the, statutes and facilitate the exclusion and return of persons belonging to the classes whose immigration congress has forbidden ; but no mere rule of the department can operate to exclude persons not belonging to one or other of the classes named in the statutes. Congress ban noi: forbidden the immigration of “parents of minor aliens, when such minor aliens are affected with a loathsome, contagious disease.” The immigration authorities therefore cannot lawfully exclude such parents for such cause; nor should they he excluded under the pretense that they are liable to become a public charge, when the board of special inquiry is not of the opinion that there is any such liability. The alien is entitled to the honest decision of the inspecting officers, wholly untrammeled by any instructions not authorized by the statutes. The return in this case indicates that there has been no such decision in this case. Therefore the finality which the statute accords to a proper decision of the inspection officers is not a, bar to inquiry here into the facts. The mat Í er is referred to the clerk of the court, with instructions to give relator an opportunity to show, if she can, that she is not within any of the classes of immigrants whom congress has excluded, and to report the evidence to the court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kishi v. The British Steamship "Willesden."
4 D. Haw. 407 (D. Hawaii, 1913)
United States v. Chin Fee
94 F. 828 (D. Vermont, 1899)
United States v. Wong Chung
92 F. 141 (N.D. New York, 1899)
In re Leong Youk Tong
90 F. 648 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Oregon, 1898)
In re Gin Fung
89 F. 153 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Oregon, 1898)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
87 F. 314, 1898 U.S. App. LEXIS 1799, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-kornmehl-circtsdny-1898.