In re Kooritzky
This text of 819 A.2d 967 (In re Kooritzky) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District of Columbia Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[968]*968ORDER
On consideration of the affidavit of Samuel G. Kooritzky, wherein he consents to disbarment from the Bar of the District of Columbia pursuant to § 12 of Rule XI of the Rules Governing the Bar of the District of Columbia, which affidavit has been filed with the Clerk of this Court, and the report and recommendation of the Board on Professional Responsibility with respect thereto, it is this 27th day of March, 2003
ORDERED that the said Samuel G. Kooritzky, is hereby disbarred by consent effective forthwith. The effective date of respondent’s disbarment should run for reinstatement purposes, from the date respondent files his affidavit pursuant to D.C. Bar Rule XI, § 14(g). It is
FURTHER ORDERED that Bar Counsel’s petition for discipline based upon respondent’s criminal conviction in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia is hereby dismissed as moot.
The Clerk shall publish this order, but the affidavit shall not be publicly disclosed or otherwise made available except upon order of the Court or upon written consent of the respondent.
The Clerk shall cause a copy of this order to be transmitted to the Chairman of the Board on Professional Responsibility and to the respondent, thereby giving him notice of the provisions of Rule XI, §§ 14 and 16, which set forth certain rights and responsibilities of disbarred attorneys and the effect of failure to comply therewith.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
819 A.2d 967, 2003 D.C. App. LEXIS 150, 2003 WL 1562265, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-kooritzky-dc-2003.