In re Konopka

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Konopka

607 A.2d 646, 128 N.J. 103, 1992 N.J. LEXIS 1320

DecidedJune 10, 1992

StatusPublished

This text of 607 A.2d 646 (In re Konopka) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Konopka, 607 A.2d 646, 128 N.J. 103, 1992 N.J. LEXIS 1320 (N.J. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed a report with the Court, recommending that MICHAEL A. KONOPKA of PASSAIC, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1971 and who was thereafter suspended from the practice of law for a period of six months by Order of this Court dated October 4, 1991, effective October 28, 1991, be restored to practice and that said restoration be conditioned on respondent’s providing to the Office of Attorney Ethics on an annual basis a certified [104]*104audit of the books and records required to be maintained pursuant to R. 1:21-6, until further Order of the Court, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that the petition for restoration to practice is granted, effective immediately, and it is further

ORDERED that MICHAEL A. KONOPKA shall submit to the Office of Attorney Ethics on an annual basis a certified audit of the books and records required to be maintained pursuant to R. 1:21-6, until further Order of the Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed a report with the Court, recommending that MICHAEL A. KONOPKA of PASSAIC, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1971 and who was thereafter suspended from the practice of law for a period of six months by Order of this Court dated October 4, 1991, effective October 28, 1991, be restored to practice and that said restoration be conditioned on respondent’s providing to the Office of Attorney Ethics on an annual basis a certified [104]*104audit of the books and records required to be maintained pursuant to R. 1:21-6, until further Order of the Court, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that the petition for restoration to practice is granted, effective immediately, and it is further

ORDERED that MICHAEL A. KONOPKA shall submit to the Office of Attorney Ethics on an annual basis a certified audit of the books and records required to be maintained pursuant to R. 1:21-6, until further Order of the Court.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

607 A.2d 646, 128 N.J. 103, 1992 N.J. LEXIS 1320, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-konopka-nj-1992.