In re Kolodziej

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Kolodziej

110 A.D.3d 1136, 972 N.Y.S.2d 526

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 10, 2013

StatusPublished

This text of 110 A.D.3d 1136 (In re Kolodziej) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Kolodziej, 110 A.D.3d 1136, 972 N.Y.S.2d 526 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Respondent was admitted to practice by this Court in 1982. He maintains an office for the practice of law in the City of Gloversville, Fulton County.

By decision dated May 12, 2011, this Court suspended respon[1137]*1137dent from the practice of law for a period of two years, which suspension was conditionally stayed (Matter of Kolodziej, 84 AD3d 1584 [2011]). Respondent now moves for termination of the stayed suspension and provides a supporting affidavit indicating that the conditions of the stay have been fully complied with. Petitioner does not oppose the motion, which we now grant.

Lahtinen, J.P, McCarthy, Spain and Garry, JJ., concur. Ordered that respondent’s motion is granted, and the stayed suspension imposed by this Court’s decision dated May 12, 2011 is terminated, effective immediately.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Respondent was admitted to practice by this Court in 1982. He maintains an office for the practice of law in the City of Gloversville, Fulton County.

By decision dated May 12, 2011, this Court suspended respon[1137]*1137dent from the practice of law for a period of two years, which suspension was conditionally stayed (Matter of Kolodziej, 84 AD3d 1584 [2011]). Respondent now moves for termination of the stayed suspension and provides a supporting affidavit indicating that the conditions of the stay have been fully complied with. Petitioner does not oppose the motion, which we now grant.

Lahtinen, J.P, McCarthy, Spain and Garry, JJ., concur. Ordered that respondent’s motion is granted, and the stayed suspension imposed by this Court’s decision dated May 12, 2011 is terminated, effective immediately.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

110 A.D.3d 1136, 972 N.Y.S.2d 526, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-kolodziej-nyappdiv-2013.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack