In re Kohout

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

In re Kohout

664 A.2d 1309

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedAugust 16, 1995

DocketNo. 125 Disciplinary Docket No. 3; Board File No. C3-92-658; No. 22629

StatusPublished

This text of 664 A.2d 1309 (In re Kohout) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Kohout, 664 A.2d 1309 (Pa. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 16th day of August, 1995, Edward Raymond Kohout having been suspended from the practice of law in the State of West Virginia for a period of two years by Order of the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia filed April 14, 1995; the said Edward Raymond Kohout having been directed on June 19,1995, to inform this Court of any claim he has that the imposition of discipline in this Commonwealth pursuant to Rule 216(a) and (c)(4), Pa.R.D.E., would be unwarranted and the reasons therefor; and upon consideration of the responses filed, it is

ORDERED that Edward Raymond Koh-out is suspended from the practice of law in this Commonwealth for a period of three years, and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E.

MONTEMURO, J., is sitting by designation. ZAPPALA and CAPPY, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 16th day of August, 1995, Edward Raymond Kohout having been suspended from the practice of law in the State of West Virginia for a period of two years by Order of the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia filed April 14, 1995; the said Edward Raymond Kohout having been directed on June 19,1995, to inform this Court of any claim he has that the imposition of discipline in this Commonwealth pursuant to Rule 216(a) and (c)(4), Pa.R.D.E., would be unwarranted and the reasons therefor; and upon consideration of the responses filed, it is

ORDERED that Edward Raymond Koh-out is suspended from the practice of law in this Commonwealth for a period of three years, and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E.

MONTEMURO, J., is sitting by designation. ZAPPALA and CAPPY, JJ., dissent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

664 A.2d 1309, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-kohout-pa-1995.