In re Kohn
This text of 259 A.D. 298 (In re Kohn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The respondent was charged with converting to his own use several small sums of money. He seriously disputed the charge that he had converted the moneys, but repaid them as soon as the matter was brought to his attention by the Association of the Bar of the City of New York. We are of the opinion, therefore, that a censure will be sufficient punishment.
Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Townley, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.
Respondent censured.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
259 A.D. 298, 19 N.Y.S.2d 262, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6123, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-kohn-nyappdiv-1940.