In re Kohn

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Kohn

259 A.D. 298, 19 N.Y.S.2d 262, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6123

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 19, 1940·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The respondent was charged with converting to his own use several small sums of money. He seriously disputed the charge that he had converted the moneys, but repaid them as soon as the matter was brought to his attention by the Association of the Bar of the City of New York. We are of the opinion, therefore, that a censure will be sufficient punishment.

Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Townley, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.

Respondent censured.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The respondent was charged with converting to his own use several small sums of money. He seriously disputed the charge that he had converted the moneys, but repaid them as soon as the matter was brought to his attention by the Association of the Bar of the City of New York. We are of the opinion, therefore, that a censure will be sufficient punishment.

Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Townley, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.

Respondent censured.

In re Kohn, 259 A.D. 298, 19 N.Y.S.2d 262, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6123 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).

Pincite

259 A.D. 298 (In re Kohn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.