in Re: Koffi Brou

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedSeptember 2, 2004
Docket14-04-00200-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in Re: Koffi Brou (in Re: Koffi Brou) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in Re: Koffi Brou, (Tex. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed September 2, 2004

Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed September 2, 2004.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-04-00200-CV

IN RE KOFFI BROU, ASSIE JEAN EKOUMANO, ASSIE EKOUMANO, ASSIE J. EKOUMANO, AJ LIMO SERVICE, A.J. LIMO SERVICE, AJ LIMO SERVICE & FINE TOWN CAR, A.J. LIMO SERVICE & FINE TOWN CAR, AJ LIMO SERVICE & FINE TOWN CAR services, a.j. LIMO SERVICE & FINE TOWN CAR SERVICES, AJ LIMO & FINE TOWN CAR, A.J. Limo & FINE TOWN CAR, AJ TOWN CAR & LIMO SERVICE, A.J. TOWN CAR AND LIMO SRVICE, A.J. LIMO SERVICES & FINE TOWN CAR, AJ LIMO SERVICE & TOWN CAR, AJ LIMO SERVICE, A.J. LIMO SERVICE, Relators

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF MANDAMUS

M E M O R A N D U M   O P I N I O N

On March 11, 2004, relators filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this Court.  See Tex. Gov=t. Code Ann. ' 22.221 (Vernon 2004); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52.  Relief was denied by opinion issued on March 25, 2004, on the grounds that relators failed to verify the factual statements in the petition and because relators failed to provide a sufficient record.  Relators filed a motion for rehearing providing a verification and in camera documents.  We granted the motion for rehearing, withdrew our opinion of March 25, 2004, and reinstated the proceeding.  We requested a response from real party in interest, Rosa Argueta.


Because we find relators have not established an abuse of discretion by the trial court, we deny relators= petition for writ of mandamus.

PER CURIAM

Petition Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed September 2, 2004.

Panel consists of Justices Fowler, Edelman, and Seymore.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in Re: Koffi Brou, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-koffi-brou-texapp-2004.