in Re Kodiak Products Co., Inc.
Opinion
|
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH |
NO. 02-12-00229-CV
|
In re Kodiak Products Co., Inc. |
RELATOR |
------------
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
MEMORANDUM OPINION[1] ON REHEARING
On July 9, 2010, this court issued a memorandum opinion denying relator’s petition for writ of mandamus as moot. Relator filed a motion for rehearing. After due consideration, we deny Relator’s motion but withdraw our prior memorandum opinion and substitute the following in its place.
The court has considered relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and is of the opinion that relief should be denied. The issues presented therein, as they relate to relator’s misappropriation of trade secrets, civil theft, and conversion claims, have become moot by virtue of the trial court’s July 2, 2012 Order Granting Defendant’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. As to relator’s remaining claim for unfair competition, the court is also of the opinion that relief should be denied. Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of mandamus is denied.
The stay of the trial court proceedings in cause number 236-252084-11, styled Kodiak Products Co., Inc. v. Charles H. Deegear, Jr. and Deemaxx Components, Inc., pending in the 236th District Court of Tarrant County, Texas, is hereby lifted.
PER CURIAM
PANEL: WALKER, DAUPHINOT, and GARDNER, JJ.
DELIVERED: August 2, 2012
[1]See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4, 52.8(d).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
in Re Kodiak Products Co., Inc. (in Re Kodiak Products Co., Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.