In re Knight

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Knight

616 A.2d 924, 130 N.J. 430, 1992 N.J. LEXIS 1349

DecidedDecember 21, 1992

StatusPublished

This text of 616 A.2d 924 (In re Knight) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Knight, 616 A.2d 924, 130 N.J. 430, 1992 N.J. LEXIS 1349 (N.J. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

LEON KNIGHT of JERSEY CITY, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1986, having represented to the Court that he would deliver the sum of $4,000 to the Office of Attorney Ethics in satisfaction of an award made on May 26,1992, by the District VI Fee Arbitration Committee within two weeks after the December 1, 1992, return date of the Order to Show Cause in this matter, and the Office of Attorney Ethics having informed the Court that no payment has been made by respondent, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that LEON KNIGHT is hereby suspended from the practice of law, effective immediately and until the further Order of the Court; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent be restrained and enjoined from practicing law during the period of his suspension and that he shall comply with Regulation 23 of the Administrative Guidelines Governing Suspended Attorneys.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

LEON KNIGHT of JERSEY CITY, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1986, having represented to the Court that he would deliver the sum of $4,000 to the Office of Attorney Ethics in satisfaction of an award made on May 26,1992, by the District VI Fee Arbitration Committee within two weeks after the December 1, 1992, return date of the Order to Show Cause in this matter, and the Office of Attorney Ethics having informed the Court that no payment has been made by respondent, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that LEON KNIGHT is hereby suspended from the practice of law, effective immediately and until the further Order of the Court; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent be restrained and enjoined from practicing law during the period of his suspension and that he shall comply with Regulation 23 of the Administrative Guidelines Governing Suspended Attorneys.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

616 A.2d 924, 130 N.J. 430, 1992 N.J. LEXIS 1349, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-knight-nj-1992.