In re Knickerbocker Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Knickerbocker Insurance

33 A.D.2d 666, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2864

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 13, 1969

StatusPublished

This text of 33 A.D.2d 666 (In re Knickerbocker Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Knickerbocker Insurance, 33 A.D.2d 666, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2864 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

—Motion granted to the extent of amending the remittitur to recite the following: “Upon the appeal herein there were presented, and necessarily passed upon, questions under the Constitution of the United States, viz.: Appellant contended that its rights under Article I, Section 10, cl. 1, and the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution were violated. The Appellate Division held that there was no violation of appellant’s rights.” In all other respects the motion is denied. Concur — Eager, J. P., Capozzoli, Tilzer, Markewieh and Steuer, JJ. ,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Motion granted to the extent of amending the remittitur to recite the following: “Upon the appeal herein there were presented, and necessarily passed upon, questions under the Constitution of the United States, viz.: Appellant contended that its rights under Article I, Section 10, cl. 1, and the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution were violated. The Appellate Division held that there was no violation of appellant’s rights.” In all other respects the motion is denied. Concur — Eager, J. P., Capozzoli, Tilzer, Markewieh and Steuer, JJ. ,

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

33 A.D.2d 666, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2864, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-knickerbocker-insurance-nyappdiv-1969.