in Re KM Development Corp.
This text of in Re KM Development Corp. (in Re KM Development Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Alma L. López, Justice
Catherine Stone, Justice
Sarah B. Duncan, Justice
Delivered and Filed: January 16, 2002
PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED; MOTION FOR EMERGENCY RELIEF DENIED
The court has considered relator's petition for writ of mandamus and motion for emergency relief, and is of the opinion that relief should be denied. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a). Accordingly, relator's petition for writ of mandamus and motion for emergency relief are denied.
Relator shall pay all costs incurred in this proceeding.
The clerk of this court is directed to transmit a copy of this opinion to the attorneys of record, the trial court judge, and the trial court clerk.
Do not publish
1. This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 1999-CI-13043, styled Aranda, et al. v. G.E. Reaves Engineering,
Inc., et al., pending in the 57th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Phylis Speedlin presiding.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re KM Development Corp., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-km-development-corp-texapp-2002.