In re Klett

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Klett

251 A.D. 894, 298 N.Y.S. 634, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8192

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 2, 1937·Published

Opinion

On appeal from so much of a decree of the Surrogate’s Court of Kings county as confirms a referee’s report and allows the claim of an objeetant, directs payment to the referee of the sum of $750 for his services, and charges the appellants individually with the costs and expenses of said reference, decree settling the accounts of the appellants unanimously affirmed, so far as appealed from, with costs to respondent Catherine Mándelas, payable by the appellants personally. No opinion. Present—• Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Davis and Johnston, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

On appeal from so much of a decree of the Surrogate’s Court of Kings county as confirms a referee’s report and allows the claim of an objeetant, directs payment to the referee of the sum of $750 for his services, and charges the appellants individually with the costs and expenses of said reference, decree settling the accounts of the appellants unanimously affirmed, so far as appealed from, with costs to respondent Catherine Mándelas, payable by the appellants personally. No opinion. Present—• Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Davis and Johnston, JJ.

In re Klett, 251 A.D. 894, 298 N.Y.S. 634, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8192 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).

Pincite

251 A.D. 894 (In re Klett) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.