In re Klett

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Klett

251 A.D. 894, 298 N.Y.S. 634, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8192

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 2, 1937

StatusPublished

This text of 251 A.D. 894 (In re Klett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Klett, 251 A.D. 894, 298 N.Y.S. 634, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8192 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).

Pincite

Opinion

On appeal from so much of a decree of the Surrogate’s Court of Kings county as confirms a referee’s report and allows the claim of an objeetant, directs payment to the referee of the sum of $750 for his services, and charges the appellants individually with the costs and expenses of said reference, decree settling the accounts of the appellants unanimously affirmed, so far as appealed from, with costs to respondent Catherine Mándelas, payable by the appellants personally. No opinion. Present—• Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Davis and Johnston, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

On appeal from so much of a decree of the Surrogate’s Court of Kings county as confirms a referee’s report and allows the claim of an objeetant, directs payment to the referee of the sum of $750 for his services, and charges the appellants individually with the costs and expenses of said reference, decree settling the accounts of the appellants unanimously affirmed, so far as appealed from, with costs to respondent Catherine Mándelas, payable by the appellants personally. No opinion. Present—• Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Davis and Johnston, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

251 A.D. 894, 298 N.Y.S. 634, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8192, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-klett-nyappdiv-1937.