In Re Kleinfeld

276 A.2d 376, 58 N.J. 217, 1971 N.J. LEXIS 240
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided April 22, 1971·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam:

Respondent was charged in a federal information with wilfully and knowingly attempting to evade and defeat a large part of income taxes due for the years 1961 through 1963. Respondent pleaded nolo contendere to one count of the information; a fine of $1,000 was imposed. Thereupon, the remaining counts of the information were dismissed. Respondent’s plea of nolo contendere is tantamount for present purposes to a plea of guilty and his conviction subjects him to disciplinary action. After a hearing, *218 the Hudson County Ethics Committee filed a presentment and we thereafter issued an order to show cause.

We have weighed all the mitigating considerations advanced by respondent. Under the circumstances, the appropriate discipline is the suspension from the practice of law for six months and until further order of this Court.

It is so ordered.

For suspension for six months — Chief Justice Wbinteaub and Justices Jacobs, Ebancis, Peoctoe, Hall, Schettino and Mountain — 7.

Opposed — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re Kleinfeld, 276 A.2d 376, 58 N.J. 217, 1971 N.J. LEXIS 240 (N.J. 1971).

276 A.2d 376 (In Re Kleinfeld) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.