In re Klein
This text of 123 N.E.2d 565 (In re Klein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Motion to dismiss appeal granted upon the ground that the order appealed from does not finally determine the special proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution. While Matter of Mohawk Overall Co. (210 N. Y. 474) may indicate otherwise, the precise question here presented was there neither raised nor discussed. In this special proceeding (Civ. Prac. Act, art. 30) the final order is that requiring the witness to appear (Rules Civ. Prac., rule 137), and not the order denying his motion to vacate (Rules Civ. Prac., rule 136). Motion for leave to appeal dismissed, with $10 costs and necessary printing disbursements.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
123 N.E.2d 565, 307 N.Y. 909, 1954 N.Y. LEXIS 1589, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-klein-ny-1954.