In re Kleibs

128 F. 656, 1904 U.S. App. LEXIS 4706
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York
DecidedMarch 7, 1904
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 128 F. 656 (In re Kleibs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Kleibs, 128 F. 656, 1904 U.S. App. LEXIS 4706 (circtsdny 1904).

Opinion

EACOMBE, Circuit Judge.

This is a peculiarly hard case, but it is not perceived that there is any theory upon which the petitioner can be discharged. Concededly, he is an alien who arrived by water at the’port of New York on November 17, 1903. He was arrested upon a warrant of the Secretary of the Department of Commerce and Babor on February 24, 1904, and was given a hearing before the ;oard of special inquiry, which boárd found that he was within one /f the classes of aliens whose entry into the United States is prohibited. The accuracy of this finding is not disputed, and the petitioner' was arrested and held for deportation less than four months after his arrival. The circumstances that he had arrived here by water on a former occasion in August, 1900, and remained in the United States four months, during which time he bought a farm and took out his first papers, and that since his second arrival he has married here, make his case a hard one, but do not relieve him from the operation of the statute.

The writ is dismissed. Attorney for the United States will give two days’ notice of application for order of dismissal, in case petitioner may wish to appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Frick v. Lewis
195 F. 693 (Sixth Circuit, 1912)
Ex parte Hoffman
179 F. 839 (Second Circuit, 1910)
United States v. Villet
173 F. 500 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York, 1909)
Ex parte Petterson
166 F. 536 (D. Minnesota, 1908)
Ex parte Crawford
165 F. 830 (S.D. New York, 1908)
United States ex rel. Funaro v. Watchorn
164 F. 152 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York, 1908)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
128 F. 656, 1904 U.S. App. LEXIS 4706, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-kleibs-circtsdny-1904.