Home/New York Court of Appeals/In re Klebanoff

In re Klebanoff

237 N.E.2d 75, 21 N.Y.2d 920, 289 N.Y.S.2d 755, 1968 N.Y. LEXIS 1491
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedApril 4, 1968
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 237 N.E.2d 75 (In re Klebanoff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Klebanoff, 237 N.E.2d 75, 21 N.Y.2d 920, 289 N.Y.S.2d 755, 1968 N.Y. LEXIS 1491 (N.Y. 1968).

Opinion

Order affirmed, without costs. (See Matter of Zuckerman, 20 N Y 2d 430, cert. den. 390 U. S. 925, decided Jan. 29, 1968.)

Concur: Judges Burke, Scileppi, Bergan, Keating, Breitel, and Jasen. Chief Judge Full concurs in the following memorandum: Despite the views which I expressed in dissent in Matter of Zuckerman (20 N Y 2d 430, 439), to which I still subscribe, I feel constrained by the court’s decision in that case and, accordingly, concur for affirmance.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ciravolo v. the Florida Bar
361 So. 2d 121 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1978)
In re Anonymous Attorneys
41 N.Y. 506 (New York Court of Appeals, 1977)
Segretti v. State Bar
544 P.2d 929 (California Supreme Court, 1976)
Maryland State Bar Ass'n v. Sugarman
329 A.2d 1 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1974)
Black v. State Bar
499 P.2d 968 (California Supreme Court, 1972)
Napolitano v. Ward
317 F. Supp. 83 (N.D. Illinois, 1970)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
237 N.E.2d 75, 21 N.Y.2d 920, 289 N.Y.S.2d 755, 1968 N.Y. LEXIS 1491, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-klebanoff-ny-1968.