In re Klebanoff
237 N.E.2d 75, 21 N.Y.2d 920, 289 N.Y.S.2d 755, 1968 N.Y. LEXIS 1491
Opinion
Order affirmed, without costs. (See Matter of Zuckerman, 20 N Y 2d 430, cert. den. 390 U. S. 925, decided Jan. 29, 1968.)
Concur: Judges Burke, Scileppi, Bergan, Keating, Breitel, and Jasen. Chief Judge Full concurs in the following memorandum: Despite the views which I expressed in dissent in Matter of Zuckerman (20 N Y 2d 430, 439), to which I still subscribe, I feel constrained by the court’s decision in that case and, accordingly, concur for affirmance.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Klebanoff, 237 N.E.2d 75, 21 N.Y.2d 920, 289 N.Y.S.2d 755, 1968 N.Y. LEXIS 1491 (N.Y. 1968).
237 N.E.2d 75 (In re Klebanoff) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ciravolo v. the Florida Bar
361 So. 2d 121 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1978)
In re Anonymous Attorneys
41 N.Y. 506 (New York Court of Appeals, 1977)
Segretti v. State Bar
544 P.2d 929 (California Supreme Court, 1976)
Maryland State Bar Ass'n v. Sugarman
329 A.2d 1 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1974)
Black v. State Bar
499 P.2d 968 (California Supreme Court, 1972)
Napolitano v. Ward
317 F. Supp. 83 (N.D. Illinois, 1970)