In re Klaus K.

77 A.D.2d 568, 429 N.Y.S.2d 730, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12276
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJuly 7, 1980
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 77 A.D.2d 568 (In re Klaus K.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Klaus K., 77 A.D.2d 568, 429 N.Y.S.2d 730, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12276 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1980).

Opinion

In a proceeding by the Commissioner of the Westchester County Department of Social Services to have the guardianship and custody of Klaus K. committed to said agency, the appeal is from so much of an order of the Family Court, Westchester County, dated July 25, 1979, as dismissed the petition and directed “that the Department of Social Services undertake to structure a visitation schedule, under supervision, as soon as possible.” Order modified by deleting therefrom the provision dismissing the petition. As so modified, order affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements, and matter remanded to the Family Court for a hearing in accordance herewith. The issue on this appeal is whether the evidence before the Family Court established that the natural mother is presently and will for the foreseeable future be unable to care for her child. A finding that she is and will for the foreseeable future be so unable would result in the termination of her parental rights pursuant to section 384-b of the Social Services Law. In view of the fact that (1) the expert psychiatric evidence was inconclusive on the question of the natural mother’s future ability to care for her child, and (2) a substantial amount of time has now passed since the expert psychiatric testimony was given, and the examinations upon which this testimony was based were held, we believe the best course is to remand for a new hearing at which time the natural mother’s current condition can be determined. Rabin, J. P., Cohalan, Martuscello and Weinstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Derick M.
89 A.D.2d 781 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
77 A.D.2d 568, 429 N.Y.S.2d 730, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12276, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-klaus-k-nyappdiv-1980.