In re Kivler

871 A.2d 661, 183 N.J. 220
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedMay 3, 2005
DocketATTORNEY NO. 001351973
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 871 A.2d 661 (In re Kivler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Kivler, 871 A.2d 661, 183 N.J. 220 (N.J. 2005).

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 04-270, concluding that RUSSELL T. KIVLER of TRENTON, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1973, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.1(a) (gross neglect), RPC 1.1(b) (pattern of neglect), RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence), RPC 1.4(a) (failure to communicate with client), RPC 1.4(b) (failure to explain matter to extent necessary for client to make informed decision), RPC 3.2 (failure to expedite litigation), and RPC 5.1(b) (failure to supervise junior attorney);

And the Disciplinary Review Board having further concluded that respondent should be required to submit proof of his fitness to practice law and to complete a course in law office management;

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that RUSSELL T. KIVLER is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent shall demonstrate that he is fit to practice law, as attested to by a mental health professional approved by the Office of Attorney Ethics, and shall submit proof thereof to the Office of Attorney Ethics within ninety days after the filing date of this Order; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent shall complete a course in law office management, offered by the Institute for Continuing Legal Education and approved by the Office of Attorney Ethics, and shall submit proof of his successful completion thereof to the Office of Attorney Ethics; and it is further

[221]*221ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Kivler
939 A.2d 216 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
871 A.2d 661, 183 N.J. 220, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-kivler-nj-2005.