In re Kirschner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Kirschner

99 A.D.2d 821, 472 N.Y.S.2d 871, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17222

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 21, 1984

StatusPublished

This text of 99 A.D.2d 821 (In re Kirschner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Kirschner, 99 A.D.2d 821, 472 N.Y.S.2d 871, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17222 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion by petitioner, Seymour Kirschner, a suspended attorney, whose period of suspension has expired, for reinstatement to the Bar of the State of New York. The matter was referred to the Committee on Character and Fitness for the Second Judicial Department for investigation and report. The report of the committee has been received by this court, and it recommends that petitioner be reinstated. This court adopts the recommendation for reinstatement; the petitioner, Seymour Kirschner, is ordered reinstated as immediately and the clerk of this court is directed to restore petitioner’s name to the roll of attorneys and counselors at law forthwith. Lazer, J. P., Mangano, Gibbons, Thompson and Rubin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion by petitioner, Seymour Kirschner, a suspended attorney, whose period of suspension has expired, for reinstatement to the Bar of the State of New York. The matter was referred to the Committee on Character and Fitness for the Second Judicial Department for investigation and report. The report of the committee has been received by this court, and it recommends that petitioner be reinstated. This court adopts the recommendation for reinstatement; the petitioner, Seymour Kirschner, is ordered reinstated as immediately and the clerk of this court is directed to restore petitioner’s name to the roll of attorneys and counselors at law forthwith. Lazer, J. P., Mangano, Gibbons, Thompson and Rubin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

99 A.D.2d 821, 472 N.Y.S.2d 871, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17222, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-kirschner-nyappdiv-1984.