In re Kirk

66 Misc. 535, 123 N.Y.S. 1061
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 15, 1910
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 66 Misc. 535 (In re Kirk) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Kirk, 66 Misc. 535, 123 N.Y.S. 1061 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1910).

Opinion

Aspinall, J.

This motion is brought to compel the hoard of elections of the city of Kew York to convene and place the party affiliation of the said William A. Kirk upon the enrollment hook of the twentieth election district of the tenth Assembly district of the borough of Brooklyn. It appears from, the moving papers that the petitioner used a fountain pen instead of a pencil having black lead in marking a cross within the circle beneath the emblem of the party in which [536]*536he desired to enroll, thereby failing to follow the directions of the statute in relation to this subject. In my opinion the intent of the statute is to secure a statement of party affiliation for public use, as the statute directs the board of elections to publish for general use after election day the declaration of every citizen as to his party affiliation. In this respect it clearly differs from the provision of the statute relating to marking ballots. There the form used is to maintain absolute secrecy as to the manner in which the citizen voted, and directs the use of a pencil having black lead to maintain a uniformity of procedure, so as to prevent the marking of a ballot in any manner which might lead to its subsequent identification. It is, therefore, evident, and it has been so held in this court in numerous proceedings of a similar character in the past, without a written opinion, however, that the law relating to the use of a pencil having black lead on enrollment blanks is merely directory and not mandatory; and where the board cf elections is enabled by the marking to determine the intention of the citizen with reference to his party affiliation it should so record the intent of the citizen.

Motion granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lorenzen v. McAfee
76 Misc. 2d 776 (New York Supreme Court, 1973)
Bengert v. Board of Elections of the County of Chenango
208 Misc. 619 (New York County Courts, 1955)
Commonwealth ex rel. Dick v. Blaker
19 Pa. D. & C. 514 (Delaware County Court of Common Pleas, 1933)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
66 Misc. 535, 123 N.Y.S. 1061, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-kirk-nysupct-1910.