In re Kirchberg

Supreme Court of Louisiana

In re Kirchberg

794 So. 2d 774, 2001 La. LEXIS 2742, 2001 WL 1112971

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided September 21, 2001·No. No. 2001-B-1935·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

IT IS ORDERED that the petition for consent discipline be and hereby is rejected.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the case be remanded for the institution of formal charges. The hearing committee and disciplinary board may consider recommendation of the sanction of permanent disbarment, if appropriate, pursuant to Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10(a) and § 24, as amended effective August 1, 2001.

/s/ Jeffrey P. Victory Justice, Supreme Court of Louisiana

CALOGERO, C.J., LOBRANO, J„ would accept consent discipline.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

IT IS ORDERED that the petition for consent discipline be and hereby is rejected.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the case be remanded for the institution of formal charges. The hearing committee and disciplinary board may consider recommendation of the sanction of permanent disbarment, if appropriate, pursuant to Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10(a) and § 24, as amended effective August 1, 2001.

/s/ Jeffrey P. Victory Justice, Supreme Court of Louisiana

CALOGERO, C.J., LOBRANO, J„ would accept consent discipline.

In re Kirchberg, 794 So. 2d 774, 2001 La. LEXIS 2742, 2001 WL 1112971 (La. 2001).

Pincite

794 So. 2d 774 (In re Kirchberg) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related